Skip to content

Women's Voices for the Earth

Navigation
... Child Obesity Is Linked to Chemicals in Plastics Saving Face: How Safe Are Cosmetics and Body Care Products? FDA relied heavily on BPA lobby 3 Bets "Toxic Substances Control Act - Plain and Simple" Cracking the Autism Riddle: Toxic Chemicals, A Serious Suspect in the Autism Outbreak Rep. Israel bill wants cleanser ingredients listed Chemicals and Our Health Autism: It's the Environment, Not Just Doctors Diagnosing More Disease Let the Baby Have His Bottle? Evaluating the Dangers of Bisphenol A Environmental Groups and Chemical Industry Agree on Regulating Toxics? Reduce Fetal Exposure to BPA and Phthalates, Experts Say Younger Girls, Bigger Breasts: Are Chemicals to Blame? Report Warns of Nano-Sunscreen Risks What's the Right Answer to the Germ Question? Discontinued Flame Retardant Detected in Baby Products and Dust A Bad Mix: Exposure May Be "Safe" Only With One Chemical at a Time The Claim: Cinnamon Oil Kills Bacteria Hispanics Face High Cancer Risk from Breathing Household Chemical With Soap and Water or Sanitizer, a Cleaning That Can Stave Off the Flu Children's Diseases Linked to Chemicals on the Rise, Professor Says What if Being Fat is Not Your Fault? America's Obesity Epidemic May Be Fueled by Chemicals in Everyday Products BPA in the Womb Shows Link to Kids' Behavior Doctors and Nurses Carry a Burden of Toxic Chemicals Just Like Yours. . . And Your Children's Momentum for revamp of toxins law Study: Chemicals, Pollutants Found in Newborns What Health Reform Won't Heal: The Effect of Environmental Toxins on Sex and Reproduction It's Best to Avoid BPA, Federal Official Says New CDC Survey Tracks Mercury Levels in Americans Use of potentially harmful chemicals kept secret under law ...
Home » News & Publications » Media Stories » Environmental Health News » Discontinued Flame Retardant Detected in Baby Products and Dust

Discontinued Flame Retardant Detected in Baby Products and Dust

Environmental Science and Technology

Kellyn Betts

August 18, 2009

Tom Webster, the associate chair of the Boston University School of Public Health’s environmental health department, has been investigating the public-health implications of flame retardant use for more than five years. Because of a paper recently published in ES&T (2009, DOI 10.1021/es9014019), Webster can for the first time answer “yes” when people ask him whether the flame retardants he studies are the same ones previously used in children’s pajamas. But he isn’t happy about it.

The new paper documents the presence of tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP or TDCP) in the foam padding of products intended for use by children, as well as in dust from U.S. homes. Heather Stapleton, an assistant environmental chemistry professor at Duke University’s Nicholas School of the Environment, is the paper’s corresponding author, and Webster is a coauthor. They say that they are concerned about both findings because a 1978 Science paper reported TDCPP to be weakly mutagenic; by the early 1980s, the flame retardant had ceased to be used in children’s pajamas. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission classifies TDCPP as a probable human carcinogen, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers it a moderate cancer hazard, according to their paper.

Read more.

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire